Peptide comparison workspace

Compare status.
Follow the evidence.

Compare any two published peptide or GLP-1 records across evidence status, clinical trials, 42 country verification routes, and qualified US research prices. Each lens stays attached to the source category that can support it.

Search the complete peptide database Download the open evidence index Open the complete 20-board matrix
40selectable peptide and medicine records
211linked evidence records
42country verification routes per record
20qualified research price boards
Universal peptide comparison

Compare FDA status, trial coverage, aliases, and evidence.

Choose any two published records. The comparison keeps approved medicines, clinical programs, and research-market listings in their correct categories, including blank-versus-zero rules for the bounded clinical-trial snapshot.

FDA-approved medicine7
Investigational clinical program13
US research price board20

Record count shows published coverage, not evidence quality, safety, or clinical strength.

Asia-Pacific日本 · 2026年7月18日Country selection changes the verification route, not the underlying compound identity.

Current comparison

CagriSema vs Zenagamtide

Both rows are investigational programs. Phase, sponsor, mechanism, and source coverage can be compared directly. Results from separate trials cannot produce a fair efficacy or safety ranking. The country lens is set to 日本.

01Evidence status
A · CagriSemaInvestigational clinical program

Phase 3 / US regulatory review

B · ZenagamtideInvestigational clinical program

Phase 3 development underway

02Trial snapshot
A · CagriSema30 NCT records

5 recruiting · 0 with posted results

B · Zenagamtide24 NCT records

10 recruiting · 0 with posted results

04Qualified US price board
A · CagriSemaNo linked research price board

Blank preserves the evidence category. It is not a zero price or a missing medicine cost estimate.

Open qualified matrix
B · ZenagamtideNo linked research price board

Blank preserves the evidence category. It is not a zero price or a missing medicine cost estimate.

Open qualified matrix
FieldCagriSemaZenagamtide
Evidence category

Investigational clinical program

Investigational clinical program

Question answered

Sponsor, phase, trial record, mechanism, and reported findings

Sponsor, phase, trial record, mechanism, and reported findings

Aliases and codes

cagrilintide + semaglutide, REDEFINE 1, REIMAGINE 1-3

amycretin, NNC0487-0111, AMAZE 7

Family

Obesity and metabolic pipeline

Obesity and metabolic pipeline

Sponsor, company, or board

Novo Nordisk

Novo Nordisk

Current record

Phase 3 / US regulatory review

Phase 3 development underway

Route or listing detail

Amylin analogue + GLP-1 receptor agonist · Once-weekly subcutaneous injection

GLP-1 + amylin receptor agonist · Once-daily oral or once-weekly subcutaneous

Published evidence coverage

8 linked records

5 linked records

Last checked

July 20, 2026

July 20, 2026

ClinicalTrials.gov snapshot

30 matched NCT records5 recruiting · 0 results postedOpen filtered trial finder →

24 matched NCT records10 recruiting · 0 results postedOpen filtered trial finder →

How to read a peptide comparison

Start with status, then compare the fields that actually match.

Which peptides are FDA approved?

An approved medicine record names the exact active ingredient, brand, application, labeled use, route, and company. A similar peptide name on a research seller page does not inherit that approval.

Browse FDA-approved medicine records

What does investigational mean?

An investigational program is being studied but is not an approved retail product. Compare sponsor, phase, registry records, population, duration, and outcome definitions before interpreting a headline result.

Browse the clinical pipeline

How does country status change a comparison?

A sponsor record, FDA approval, or US research listing is only the starting identity. The destination country’s product record and its separate seller or supply register decide what can be supported locally.

Open the 42-country source router

Can research peptide prices be compared?

Yes, when nominal vial size, visible list price, seller market, availability, and checked date match. Those commercial fields still do not establish clinical equivalence or laboratory quality.

Open the complete price matrix
Intent preserved

One evidence comparison. No silent switch to an unrelated price pair.

You arrived with a named comparison or destination. The result above stays focused on identity, approval status, clinical-trial coverage, and official country records. Research-market prices and seller evidence remain available as separate tools.

Separate price workspace20 boards · 190 possible pairs

Compare only qualified exact-size US research boards, with dated prices, availability, and source coverage.

Open the complete price matrix
Separate seller workspacePrice, stock, COA access

Filter sourced listings by exact board, public document access, current availability, and vendor evidence.

Open the peptide vendor finder
Interpretation rule

Comparable fields do not create equivalent compounds.

A board can normalize dollars, milligrams, public evidence access, and availability. It cannot normalize molecular identity, potency, research purpose, clinical evidence, safety, or personal suitability.

Open the evidence-status map