1 of 3 rows in stock
Phase 3 program reporting results
Peptide comparison workspaceCompare status.
Compare status.
Follow the evidence.
Compare any two published peptide or GLP-1 records across evidence status, clinical trials, 42 country verification routes, and qualified US research prices. Each lens stays attached to the source category that can support it.
Search the complete peptide database Download the open evidence index Open the complete 20-board matrix40selectable peptide and medicine records
211linked evidence records
42country verification routes per record
20qualified research price boards
Universal peptide comparison
Compare FDA status, trial coverage, aliases, and evidence.
Choose any two published records. The comparison keeps approved medicines, clinical programs, and research-market listings in their correct categories, including blank-versus-zero rules for the bounded clinical-trial snapshot.
FDA-approved medicine7
Investigational clinical program13
US research price board20
Record count shows published coverage, not evidence quality, safety, or clinical strength.
Latin AmericaArgentina · 18 de julio de 2026Country selection changes the verification route, not the underlying compound identity.
IGF-1 LR3 vs Retatrutide
These records belong to different evidence categories. IGF-1 LR3 is tracked as a US research price board, while Retatrutide is tracked as an investigational clinical program. The table helps resolve identity and status. It does not make the products clinically or commercially equivalent. The country lens is set to Argentina.
Blank means outside this 13-program dataset, not zero trials.
2 recruiting · 2 with posted results
Local status requires the destination records.
Open exact Argentina guide →1 country-specific source record is attached.
Open exact Argentina guide →0.1 mg board · 1/3 rows available · median $27.00
Open exact-size board →Blank preserves the evidence category. It is not a zero price or a missing medicine cost estimate.
Open qualified matrix →FieldIGF-1 LR3Retatrutide
Evidence category
US research price board
Investigational clinical program
Question answered
Public seller price, nominal vial size, availability, and evidence access
Sponsor, phase, trial record, mechanism, and reported findings
Aliases and codes
Long R3 IGF-1, Insulin-like growth factor long chain R3, 100 mcg IGF-1 LR3
LY3437943, triple agonist, reta, reta peptide
Family
Growth-signaling analogues
Obesity and metabolic pipeline
Sponsor, company, or board
0.1 mg like-for-like comparison
Eli Lilly and Company
Current record
1 of 3 rows in stock
Phase 3 program reporting results
Route or listing detail
Long-arginine-3 insulin-like growth factor analogue research reagent
GIP + GLP-1 + glucagon receptor agonist · Once-weekly subcutaneous injection
Published evidence coverage
4 linked records
4 linked records
Last checked
Jul 23, 2026
July 20, 2026
ClinicalTrials.gov snapshot
Not indexed by the current 13-program snapshotBlank is a scope boundary, not evidence that no trial history exists.Open the bounded trial finder →
34 matched NCT records2 recruiting · 2 results postedOpen filtered trial finder →
How to read a peptide comparison
Start with status, then compare the fields that actually match.
Which peptides are FDA approved?
An approved medicine record names the exact active ingredient, brand, application, labeled use, route, and company. A similar peptide name on a research seller page does not inherit that approval.
Browse FDA-approved medicine records →What does investigational mean?
An investigational program is being studied but is not an approved retail product. Compare sponsor, phase, registry records, population, duration, and outcome definitions before interpreting a headline result.
Browse the clinical pipeline →How does country status change a comparison?
A sponsor record, FDA approval, or US research listing is only the starting identity. The destination country’s product record and its separate seller or supply register decide what can be supported locally.
Open the 42-country source router →Can research peptide prices be compared?
Yes, when nominal vial size, visible list price, seller market, availability, and checked date match. Those commercial fields still do not establish clinical equivalence or laboratory quality.
Open the complete price matrix →Intent preserved
One evidence comparison. No silent switch to an unrelated price pair.
You arrived with a named comparison or destination. The result above stays focused on identity, approval status, clinical-trial coverage, and official country records. Research-market prices and seller evidence remain available as separate tools.
Keep the selected records and destination attached while you review the decision dashboard and primary evidence.
Return to the current evidence result ↑Compare only qualified exact-size US research boards, with dated prices, availability, and source coverage.
Open the complete price matrix →Filter sourced listings by exact board, public document access, current availability, and vendor evidence.
Open the peptide vendor finder →Interpretation rule
Comparable fields do not create equivalent compounds.
A board can normalize dollars, milligrams, public evidence access, and availability. It cannot normalize molecular identity, potency, research purpose, clinical evidence, safety, or personal suitability.
Open the evidence-status map